{"id":"W132285076","doi":"10.1007/s00107-013-0729-9","title":"Potential of pulp and paper secondary sludge as co-adhesive and formaldehyde scavenger for particleboard manufacturing","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Wood and Wood Products","topic":"Lignin and Wood Chemistry","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; FPInnovations; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Flexural strength; Adhesive; Urea-formaldehyde; Pulp (tooth); Materials science; Formaldehyde; Pulp and paper industry; Composite material; Kraft paper; Kraft process; Kappa number; Flexural modulus; Young's modulus; Chemistry; Dentistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003064792,0.0001674283,0.0002467865,0.000053147,0.00006306069,0.00007329309,0.0000913581,0.00003070014,0.00001810987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003120728,0.0001391371,0.00004469794,0.00003050115,0.00006886181,0.0004061288,0.00004415912,0.0001985195,0.000004553631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006396781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001599982,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.004798e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.056107e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990994,0.00003757355,0.0003696,0.0001506959,0.000116955,0.0002257832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994646,0.00002865099,0.0001290658,0.000120253,0.00008862915,0.0001687415],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004883886,0.00003833196,0.0001284733,0.0008371565,0.0002218556,0.0000509149,0.001600262,0.00002345664,0.9590138,0.00001674701,0.01282404,0.02519614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001323855,0.0003008615,0.003353134,0.0001006236,0.00006911533,0.0003792631,0.000416489,0.00001894109,0.9891128,0.0001565159,0.004585055,0.0001833814],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939979,0.002877461,0.00001424001,0.0003909527,0.0001512517,0.0001535423,0.000009497765,0.000018936,0.002386247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979956,0.0003980976,0.000947825,0.00007673542,0.0003987213,0.000001802467,0.00000212783,0.00003796974,0.0001411446],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03009898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5673845,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006063574414330207,"score_gpt":0.1856279098575908,"score_spread":0.1795643354432606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}