{"id":"W137728122","doi":"10.1023/a:1022160504156","title":"An Alternative Algorithm to FFT for the Numerical Evaluation of Stokes's Integral","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica","topic":"Geophysics and Gravity Measurements","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada; University of Calgary; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Computation; Geodesy; Geoid; Grid; Arc (geometry); Kernel (algebra); Point (geometry); Numerical integration; Algorithm; Mathematics; Geometry; Geology; Mathematical analysis; Geophysics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008937118,0.0001798494,0.0002436989,0.00003870156,0.0002063409,0.00004661109,0.0003878594,0.00003038051,0.000875912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005755945,0.0001225412,0.0001186707,0.0002891827,0.00008842484,0.0001470493,0.0000123801,0.0001242808,0.0002617625],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008155905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001217167,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003164341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002979391,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979998,0.0002136949,0.0002229674,0.0003412333,0.0008889451,0.0003333142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988227,0.0002490027,0.00007293143,0.0003569463,0.0003676168,0.0001308179],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001152209,0.0002769603,0.002050095,0.000006872875,0.0001660648,6.113724e-7,0.001919716,0.01128627,0.0001203607,0.0007886667,0.0005756232,0.9826936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001112112,0.001506014,0.7387466,0.0000225867,0.0002996481,9.085738e-7,0.0005941586,0.2310804,0.0003140319,0.02073371,0.005246079,0.0003437403],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786939,0.000166787,0.00427838,0.001859074,0.0005219473,0.002377179,0.0007290906,0.00004087316,0.01133278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996833,0.000013688,0.002335952,0.0003540367,0.0002328997,0.00004311296,0.00009570156,0.000006654805,0.00008499081],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9823498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9590622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03761055907825107,"score_gpt":0.3077010373414513,"score_spread":0.2700904782632003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}