{"id":"W137728122","doi":"10.1023/a:1022160504156","title":"An Alternative Algorithm to FFT for the Numerical Evaluation of Stokes's Integral","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica","topic":"Geophysics and Gravity Measurements","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada; University of Calgary; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Computation; Geodesy; Geoid; Grid; Arc (geometry); Kernel (algebra); Point (geometry); Numerical integration; Algorithm; Mathematics; Geometry; Geology; Mathematical analysis; Geophysics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007820716,0.001180857,0.0008253292,0.001195452,0.0009263239,0.001379472,0.001449652,0.001079181,0.01645526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005285775,0.0003355342,0.0007316477,0.001547966,0.000615716,0.002113085,0.001112748,0.001556481,0.00587644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005104005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001311237,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005876863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007428228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994691,0.0001099382,0.00004604457,0.00005981857,0.0002684282,0.00004676846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987695,0.0004457513,0.00005488155,0.0001994296,0.0004757524,0.000054636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003380838,0.0001462026,0.0007256853,0.0002880197,0.00009286965,0.0002692443,0.0003990057,0.02912821,0.03698731,0.1333452,0.01827856,0.7800016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001750677,0.0001306463,0.0006672771,0.00009112437,0.00004456609,0.0005350209,0.0001153384,0.8551018,0.02086877,0.06832609,0.05387393,0.00007041243],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002070162,0.0001226539,0.9947258,0.0001010903,0.0002117591,0.00003765857,0.00004988228,0.0008596646,0.001821297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02858191,0.0001918145,0.9657612,0.00009129996,0.0001293479,0.0001406469,0.0001559286,0.0004826238,0.004465206],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01645526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05504835,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03761055907825107,"score_gpt":0.3077010373414513,"score_spread":0.2700904782632003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}