{"id":"W138516669","doi":"10.4401/ag-3618","title":"Some preliminary results of a worldwide seismicity estimation: a case study of seismic hazard evaluation in South America","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Geophysics","topic":"earthquake and tectonic studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Induced seismicity; Seismology; Geology; Seismic moment; Seismic hazard; Moment magnitude scale; Maximum magnitude; Magnitude (astronomy); Subduction; Hazard map; Geodesy; Fault (geology); Tectonics; Geometry; Scaling; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001076868,0.000507048,0.0002935668,0.001921254,0.0002856791,0.0005431662,0.0002813047,0.0003369164,0.001502983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005753006,0.0001236969,0.0002886882,0.002891563,0.0003773662,0.0005884778,0.0007840818,0.0002342524,0.0001246374],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006196234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002670871,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03815253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06894918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996032,0.0002044607,0.00002820325,0.00005396605,0.00006310439,0.00004702126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982224,0.001082733,0.0002509124,0.0001249254,0.0002344363,0.00008452909],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003888579,0.0002825381,0.8192186,0.0002149283,0.0002236947,0.002648348,0.005654125,0.05521164,0.004354473,0.001643652,0.001355129,0.108804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004559826,0.000389199,0.9177634,0.0000524485,0.0001737561,0.0007240571,0.0122432,0.05965747,0.002757118,0.001112162,0.005021818,0.00005979111],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954,0.00008248235,0.002812783,0.00006268372,0.000001629305,0.00002473461,0.0002966491,0.00002361319,0.001295456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959273,0.0001010726,0.002714927,0.000008355472,0.000003252934,0.00001599297,0.000589305,0.00001413838,0.0006258216],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03815253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07586092,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0520171040681446,"score_gpt":0.2947810001461506,"score_spread":0.242763896078006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}