{"id":"W14092155","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.018.003","title":"Balancing Ethical Principles in Evaluation: A Case Study","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neglect; Engineering ethics; Politics; Indigenous; Ethical decision; Ethical issues; Ethical code; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1124486,0.0008658094,0.0008751741,0.002803263,0.02794385,0.01031405,0.003357169,0.0104163,0.003450843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1186845,0.0009008117,0.001216244,0.003524309,0.01789546,0.006968302,0.01092052,0.01130334,0.0004548175],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01661272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01514481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008071973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020628,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8369499,0.1454846,0.002799709,0.001240283,0.008023588,0.005501984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8371333,0.1405865,0.004823931,0.00286696,0.008402903,0.006186506],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004008676,0.004381118,0.0176652,0.001446769,0.00008324906,0.078609,0.6739054,0.00262862,0.0008339896,0.1092062,0.01447721,0.09636242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001913141,0.001049972,0.005356356,0.003117013,0.00008888822,0.03102675,0.8289547,0.004106191,0.001999617,0.02839749,0.09556248,0.0001492289],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8208747,0.005744351,0.03167982,0.05575488,0.0005532083,0.00307033,0.00007800375,0.00005787367,0.08218686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692004,0.003051274,0.01737877,0.003835305,0.0001362341,0.0013057,0.00002238152,0.00003976755,0.005030126],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1124486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.594692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5803079388152322,"score_gpt":0.5911604505217036,"score_spread":0.01085251170647139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}