{"id":"W1436212465","doi":"","title":"Application of Population Viability Theory to Moose in Mainland Nova Scotia","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alces","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Population viability analysis; Population; Metapopulation; Habitat; Population size; Ecology; Biology; Small population size; Minimum viable population; Population decline; Effective population size; Nova scotia; Threatened species; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Endangered species; Biological dispersal; Demography; Genetic diversity","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001039606,0.00004796689,0.00006055849,0.0000321605,0.00001378186,0.000003924107,0.00007125729,0.00006259742,0.00008438421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003274403,0.00004738347,0.0000220587,0.00008350632,0.00001724838,0.000002231517,0.00003121014,0.00002086899,0.0000168803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004308773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001959199,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002114357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000309637,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995953,0.00003648777,0.0001047378,0.0001399796,0.00005790193,0.00006557936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997458,0.00000687534,0.00003686065,0.0001614505,0.00002494218,0.00002406339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004603859,0.00004196626,0.9312856,0.00001780207,0.000009881775,1.581994e-7,0.0002110344,0.001990557,0.04685025,0.0006381735,0.0002936064,0.01861498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002186745,0.00005282852,0.9787481,0.00000369849,0.00000650596,9.674088e-7,0.00005022271,0.0001871775,0.01533189,0.001449772,0.00386619,0.00008392603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967021,0.00007929945,0.002315334,0.00007921922,0.000042301,0.0001352591,0.00001068818,0.000002690643,0.0006330718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988297,0.000004356325,0.0008556184,0.00009885597,0.00002977651,0.000001367291,0.00006223378,0.000002865101,0.0001152704],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04746259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1932242,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009998313180007648,"score_gpt":0.2368774691258773,"score_spread":0.2268791559458696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}