{"id":"W1441912893","doi":"10.1177/082585970702300402","title":"Meta-analysis of Survival Prediction with Palliative Performance Scale","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Palliative Care","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Louisville; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Proportional hazards model; Survival analysis; Hazard ratio; Palliative care; Cancer survival; Hazard; Scale (ratio); Medicine; Overall survival; Cancer; Statistics; Demography; Oncology; Internal medicine; Confidence interval; Mathematics; Biology; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04950521,0.002584743,0.01011981,0.00365808,0.0006037824,0.003297669,0.002415118,0.002092656,0.002008403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1066844,0.001038597,0.03859726,0.004800591,0.0006864291,0.001472931,0.001344558,0.002696724,0.0002196131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001207351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001480599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004495983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00423077,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9375189,0.0523329,0.003623261,0.003766503,0.002259328,0.0004990514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8926847,0.09226903,0.005699108,0.007042602,0.001851952,0.0004525983],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004178908,0.00002263138,0.02501168,0.009437776,0.9467319,0.0001237197,0.00004160488,0.003495463,0.0001622123,0.0002524644,0.0007321021,0.009809483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001308128,0.0005542054,0.01750003,0.00117883,0.9718798,0.0001668731,0.00003102601,0.003827487,0.0003032191,0.001495251,0.001712579,0.00004249518],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.143489,0.8179881,0.0271579,0.002865114,0.00175432,0.0004207275,0.004489657,0.000453747,0.001381345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9411077,0.04503259,0.009120771,0.0009176412,0.000697658,0.0005405107,0.002025174,0.0001359373,0.0004218878],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04950521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2618117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2183275064004022,"score_gpt":0.4227687069357291,"score_spread":0.2044412005353269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}