{"id":"W1441912893","doi":"10.1177/082585970702300402","title":"Meta-analysis of Survival Prediction with Palliative Performance Scale","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Palliative Care","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Louisville; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Proportional hazards model; Survival analysis; Hazard ratio; Palliative care; Cancer survival; Hazard; Scale (ratio); Medicine; Overall survival; Cancer; Statistics; Demography; Oncology; Internal medicine; Confidence interval; Mathematics; Biology; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007510355,0.0002540214,0.00199537,0.0006690017,0.00004909376,0.000007405563,0.000159365,0.0001196033,0.0001956341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001787085,0.0001619496,0.001200841,0.001296524,0.0001961041,0.0001873331,0.000025259,0.0003539502,0.000001649123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002089781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000187326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003423378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000194381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972856,0.00009508637,0.001066902,0.0002050504,0.001095812,0.0002515437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938072,0.0004241475,0.001447193,0.0002460997,0.003886835,0.0001885522],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001203143,0.0001347302,0.8895011,0.000251103,0.09232425,0.00003980525,0.01423512,0.0006966921,0.0009861361,0.0000301773,0.0000782425,0.0005194888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001606495,0.002038902,0.7917766,0.0003587609,0.1505286,0.000002398001,0.01715721,0.0001287921,0.0353337,0.00000795184,0.0009123845,0.0001482715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793522,0.008771147,0.008573404,0.0001281975,0.0001516355,0.0002152092,0.0001756169,0.00001051032,0.002622103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916346,0.001137172,0.006747633,0.00007114803,0.0001584675,0.000003123514,0.0000399501,0.00002028398,0.0001876008],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09772454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6604114,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2183275064004022,"score_gpt":0.4227687069357291,"score_spread":0.2044412005353269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}