{"id":"W1462373416","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.07.010","title":"A principal component analysis is conducted for a case series quality appraisal checklist","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":182,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Institute of Health Economics","funders":"Instituto de Salud Carlos III","keywords":"Checklist; Principal component analysis; Delphi method; Quality (philosophy); Series (stratigraphy); Delphi; Statistics; Confounding; Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7373809,0.0003356916,0.0221186,0.0005197764,0.0001058701,0.0001389461,0.001637022,0.0003938302,0.001808855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8731821,0.0001516698,0.01292726,0.001358879,0.0004374922,0.0003008381,0.0001797668,0.0006730218,0.000211025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003866041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004389253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006403192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001702109,"domain_scores_codex":[0.818772,0.110163,0.06708659,0.0009750772,0.002550283,0.0004530442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3012669,0.5532808,0.1223622,0.005901329,0.01459438,0.002594414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000722028,0.0003906715,0.7590719,0.00004934675,0.006888025,0.0002695361,0.000525523,0.0008592147,0.000007026626,0.01070601,0.214764,0.005746717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002887272,0.00137801,0.2018018,0.00002454899,0.006088418,0.004026882,0.002358939,0.03127665,0.000004067595,0.0509905,0.6987383,0.000424541],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8254893,0.0006532599,0.1535574,0.01746452,0.001823982,0.000372835,0.00006992407,0.000003648907,0.0005652145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9168453,0.00003949441,0.07614017,0.003510542,0.001000621,0.00001487251,0.00001019369,0.00001143849,0.00242744],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5572701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991036,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9595818293892947,"score_gpt":0.7319207375962263,"score_spread":0.2276610917930684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}