{"id":"W146466143","doi":"","title":"Protected area effectiveness: evaluation of biological outcomes in protected areas","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland)","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Protected area; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Population; Natural resource; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02682851,0.0009546448,0.0009895675,0.004383023,0.0004929293,0.001676603,0.001204262,0.0008518119,0.005918852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05128342,0.0002191575,0.003109135,0.004776958,0.001666345,0.00267914,0.002184365,0.001306989,0.0006780418],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001343933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007345413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006461695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001273837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9758928,0.01064335,0.003523216,0.001673734,0.007679684,0.0005872037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9308254,0.03916115,0.02101715,0.002427905,0.005017515,0.001550798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003598818,0.001871671,0.7029945,0.006321747,0.006223646,0.0002081224,0.001717028,0.008582023,0.001735033,0.0069912,0.005569385,0.2541867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001580101,0.009033779,0.9619752,0.001061448,0.001609679,0.0002399433,0.001792852,0.004866449,0.002150835,0.005496265,0.01151453,0.0001011423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.874432,0.00959273,0.0354657,0.0009821389,0.0005014163,0.007578417,0.01802519,0.0003597378,0.05306275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9653412,0.001706838,0.02119248,0.0002124983,0.0001268055,0.006414859,0.002867543,0.00005420673,0.002083745],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02682851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1418844,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01862969943368607,"score_gpt":0.2194774778919995,"score_spread":0.2008477784583135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}