{"id":"W147178430","doi":"10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.973","title":"Prognostic Value of Fractional Flow Reserve","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","topic":"Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":620,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Abbott Vascular; School of Medicine, New York University; Gazi Üniversitesi; Boston Scientific Corporation; York University; St. Jude Medical; American College of Cardiology Foundation; AstraZeneca; Eli Lilly and Company","keywords":"Medicine; Fractional flow reserve; Value (mathematics); Cardiology; Flow (mathematics); Internal medicine; Mechanics; Statistics; Myocardial infarction; Coronary angiography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007643255,0.0006937416,0.001205192,0.001407305,0.0001975995,0.001230299,0.0005873151,0.001014104,0.00265594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02068171,0.000281656,0.0029446,0.0013032,0.0006483161,0.0005894464,0.0003876573,0.001148422,0.0002006183],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004419363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004849642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008920353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007544883,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974722,0.001196827,0.0002994884,0.000593879,0.0003028061,0.0001346225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9706299,0.02079827,0.00589496,0.001318716,0.0008743582,0.0004836621],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005127006,0.00009425746,0.9133518,0.002264059,0.01885658,0.0001529121,0.00006374051,0.003066691,0.0007435016,0.000703007,0.001427436,0.05414915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006143195,0.001185894,0.9459726,0.001479011,0.03059302,0.001124185,0.00007920436,0.00700186,0.00125175,0.005613811,0.004987204,0.0000971131],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.5879212,0.3952153,0.004233749,0.003710986,0.0004160245,0.00006437276,0.004150497,0.0001048599,0.004182956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912915,0.006782635,0.0006889232,0.0002072229,0.000320201,0.00001431603,0.0005657402,0.000008331377,0.000121083],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007643255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04042184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03211188110922116,"score_gpt":0.3498967321371151,"score_spread":0.317784851027894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}