{"id":"W1480967660","doi":"10.4271/2005-01-2413","title":"Consideration of Static-Strain-Dependent Dynamic Complex Modulus in Dynamic Stiffness Calculation of Mount/Bushing by Commercial Finite Element Codes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series","topic":"Elasticity and Material Modeling","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Novelis (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Bushing; Finite element method; Stiffness; Structural engineering; Modulus; Dynamic modulus; Strain (injury); Materials science; Engineering; Dynamic mechanical analysis; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004958485,0.0003727057,0.0002550156,0.0003822112,0.0002031043,0.0002994787,0.0006813756,0.0004492219,0.002972872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001788074,0.0002320078,0.0002645648,0.00033114,0.0002185973,0.0005650542,0.000259854,0.0004060454,0.0007916367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002446572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003687791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001443988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00257046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997228,0.00006943776,0.00001893192,0.00002091763,0.0001539118,0.00001407977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991026,0.0004967539,0.00006086504,0.00009528247,0.000232302,0.00001231184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001432495,0.0001180657,0.004071335,0.0008296716,0.00003693143,0.0005237433,0.000367683,0.4677841,0.2330822,0.03805788,0.004086557,0.2508985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009117231,0.00004726127,0.0009305318,0.00003697845,0.00001123096,0.0002218858,0.0000371636,0.9508042,0.03917635,0.001816347,0.006895281,0.00001354183],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0365671,0.0002829053,0.9574349,0.00007992315,0.00005132173,0.00004548407,0.00007672206,0.0006166304,0.004845098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4913141,0.0006619651,0.4998026,0.00006222771,0.00002857899,0.0001826086,0.0002798556,0.0005488573,0.007119218],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002972872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009945273,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01343464437661816,"score_gpt":0.2523010755090933,"score_spread":0.2388664311324751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}