{"id":"W1482270157","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1210.4903","title":"Detecting Change-Points in Time Series by Maximum Mean Discrepancy of Ordinal Pattern Distributions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Series (stratigraphy); Time series; Computer science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Monotonic function; Ordinal optimization; Algorithm; Calibration; Ordinal data; Pattern recognition (psychology); Statistics; Mathematics; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002826251,0.0001283774,0.0003498155,0.000187202,0.0000961609,0.00001932065,0.0002101672,0.00006102374,0.0007919954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002300498,0.0001610071,0.000138711,0.0006171777,0.00005666948,0.0005577118,0.0001251005,0.0000900016,0.0002326992],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001105512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004430149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00297326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004295148,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990358,0.00002604497,0.0003157801,0.0002839233,0.00001813263,0.0003203711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993002,0.00002529604,0.0002707035,0.0002872675,0.0000246915,0.00009184961],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002119633,0.0001364335,0.9520663,0.00003017042,0.00007994811,0.000006735625,0.0004180475,0.00003465203,0.00003243892,0.04667183,0.00008828041,0.0004139377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004040311,0.0005351318,0.822585,0.0002801023,0.0002514882,0.00003461031,0.003818705,0.04267744,0.001108509,0.07267382,0.04923555,0.002759368],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845901,0.0003221697,0.01253916,0.00007172699,0.00008686415,0.0001155693,0.0003508667,0.00002414697,0.001899475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985314,0.00004027422,0.00003794717,0.00001040571,0.00005031382,0.000001281139,0.000035213,0.00001179891,0.00128135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1294814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8671794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06115794595364967,"score_gpt":0.1659770723882295,"score_spread":0.1048191264345799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}