{"id":"W1482501711","doi":"10.31542/j.ecj.84","title":"Conserving China's Biodiversity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Earth Common Journal","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; China; Sustainability; Deforestation (computer science); Wildlife; Urbanization; Geography; Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Christian ministry; Environmental planning; Ecology; Environmental protection; Environmental resource management; Political science; Biology; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002188486,0.00009140089,0.00009278006,0.00004347609,0.0007152267,0.00015578,0.0003112475,0.00003291035,0.02284442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000127526,0.00007911411,0.00006942909,0.0001289042,0.0001219129,0.0002600441,0.0003905511,0.0001961172,0.004985242],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004395788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005538985,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001326173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001791161,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999173,0.0000770218,0.0001315829,0.0001254063,0.0002756259,0.0002172915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995587,0.00001767481,0.00009056944,0.0001543223,0.00001157513,0.0001671133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003679487,0.00002928755,0.9580327,0.000001670653,0.00001127412,0.00001578236,0.0004173839,0.000113878,0.0001364911,0.000001299857,0.032981,0.008255606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000243543,0.00003095332,0.9104734,0.000005199865,0.000009976062,0.00003140132,0.000299814,0.000259595,0.00004829635,0.0001552809,0.0883428,0.00009976049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9768768,0.00002941931,0.00009567398,0.0049704,0.0001908332,0.0001066164,0.000002115625,0.00002817905,0.01769997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960196,0.00003234847,0.0006009137,0.001166939,0.00004510357,6.637115e-7,0.000002175248,0.000002583814,0.002129698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0553618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007315271110253166,"score_gpt":0.1711300684505161,"score_spread":0.163814797340263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}