{"id":"W1483670420","doi":"10.1002/cnm.2468","title":"Evaluation of mesh morphing and mapping techniques in patient specific modelling of the human pelvis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","topic":"Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Sunnybrook Health Science Centre; Sunnybrook Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Morphing; Finite element method; Mesh generation; Pelvis; Computer science; Deformation (meteorology); Compression (physics); Computer vision; Materials science; Structural engineering; Anatomy; Engineering; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003283522,0.00008670308,0.0002458219,0.0003338138,0.00002019559,0.000007922748,0.0001210475,0.00007058233,0.00001633472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006865974,0.00006274767,0.00008860767,0.0002019365,0.000063842,0.00009898608,0.00006170338,0.0002886259,5.128036e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001649734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003411837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001174035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.115801e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983399,0.0001128678,0.0005775286,0.00008813255,0.0007220618,0.0001595126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992646,0.0002133614,0.0001628343,0.00007111738,0.0002107602,0.00007735171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001212104,0.0007020854,0.01890953,0.0002142527,0.0003043846,0.0000105024,0.004116544,0.00849955,0.3732763,0.004563321,0.00007454051,0.5892078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003515404,0.0003252245,0.0323847,0.003641651,0.0001857584,0.0005951885,0.0008930413,0.7820007,0.1511342,0.006683078,0.01823743,0.0004036051],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3666655,0.0008049876,0.6316242,0.0002325552,0.0004638461,0.0001578131,0.000002647202,0.000005597327,0.00004285347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6909077,0.00005113042,0.3088529,0.00001816207,0.0001483716,0.00001055105,0.000001521,0.000007965839,0.000001772698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7735012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2558776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08345402421653086,"score_gpt":0.407213475357668,"score_spread":0.3237594511411371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}