{"id":"W1484251259","doi":"10.1177/070674371305800306","title":"Developing an Evaluation Framework for Consumer-Centred Collaborative Care of Depression Using Input from Stakeholders","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Dalhousie University; Hamilton Health Sciences; Centre for Family Medicine; McGill University; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Collaborative Care; Mental health; General partnership; Thematic analysis; Health care; Nursing; Psychology; Qualitative research; Medicine; Business; Sociology; Psychiatry; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2906954,0.003017822,0.003761264,0.01280136,0.006480995,0.01336159,0.007747608,0.006098831,0.004082992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1502541,0.001349277,0.003805675,0.01137226,0.009209644,0.01213906,0.01222553,0.004817414,0.0008478356],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05728831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1323475,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03464322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05279084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6542489,0.2999694,0.01820533,0.00402581,0.02003107,0.003519541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8480291,0.09963387,0.007318607,0.003834852,0.0378276,0.003356034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003025938,0.0006532199,0.003861989,0.06374907,0.0005423154,0.0009293969,0.07937945,0.004990848,0.0009425682,0.3265526,0.01607618,0.5020197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008940628,0.001178711,0.006333335,0.2602901,0.00144974,0.00107214,0.1689979,0.008965039,0.002574422,0.1354183,0.4124438,0.0003826075],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02090172,0.1549126,0.4654733,0.09260377,0.002269239,0.1151436,0.001398185,0.0005144752,0.1467831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1331683,0.02944248,0.7693781,0.003671692,0.00008602616,0.06089062,0.0006350395,0.00006025432,0.00266755],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2906954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8746988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5978525208049613,"score_gpt":0.5091887903828516,"score_spread":0.08866373042210973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}