{"id":"W1485151032","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02134.x","title":"Multi‐level functional responses for wildlife conservation: the case of threatened caribou in managed boreal forests","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université Laval; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Woodland caribou; Habitat; Ecology; Taiga; Disturbance (geology); Boreal; Wildlife; Selection (genetic algorithm); Geography; Snag; Canopy; Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001756745,0.0002550312,0.0002405869,0.0006275979,0.0004897689,0.0008089488,0.0005006145,0.0004900098,0.001374983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003167808,0.0001131854,0.000373853,0.0003847649,0.0008120389,0.0005362577,0.0006319116,0.0003516844,0.00006011468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007314187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003506975,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02148437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07695051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999447,0.0003410933,0.00001847511,0.00007639951,0.0000397413,0.00007718724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983557,0.0006723712,0.0005129213,0.0001347987,0.0001292333,0.0001949138],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007700992,0.00004297426,0.9879327,0.00004058165,0.00009195433,0.0002089432,0.001543079,0.0007315162,0.0004763084,0.0002778563,0.0001493153,0.008427817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001295444,0.00004418953,0.9945948,0.00001501855,0.00002030001,0.0001222949,0.002608741,0.001904978,0.00004651681,0.0004395913,0.0001957966,0.000006593555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998969,0.0002360694,0.0002956149,0.000173285,0.000003554303,0.000002842333,0.00003541984,0.000002846818,0.0002814497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996973,0.00003239109,0.0001690733,0.00002164394,0.000003207254,0.000003300037,0.00002281133,6.40956e-7,0.00004967471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02148437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04271865,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04194820553813171,"score_gpt":0.2634896601196778,"score_spread":0.2215414545815461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}