{"id":"W1485151032","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02134.x","title":"Multi‐level functional responses for wildlife conservation: the case of threatened caribou in managed boreal forests","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université Laval; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Woodland caribou; Habitat; Ecology; Taiga; Disturbance (geology); Boreal; Wildlife; Selection (genetic algorithm); Geography; Snag; Canopy; Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001434224,0.00009879985,0.0002245555,0.00007875903,0.0001480228,0.000005063095,0.0001431611,0.0001414357,0.000189955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001788228,0.00007336144,0.0000679142,0.000154491,0.0002485573,0.0001769226,0.00005718623,0.0001778994,0.00001028564],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001284181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006042949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001563575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007222209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989582,0.00009712148,0.0004988651,0.0001036815,0.00009387788,0.0002482199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984694,0.0008678044,0.0004452063,0.0001216378,0.0000362033,0.00005977228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001286076,0.0001909149,0.9860398,0.000006739573,0.00004249251,0.00003386316,0.0003680663,0.00118752,0.0002199648,0.001758345,0.008217758,0.000648452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015994,0.0001326341,0.99411,0.000002693575,0.00004250365,0.0004878771,0.000382577,0.0005075679,0.0001285698,0.001732156,0.0008034708,0.00007047976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949296,0.00001485209,0.0009931775,0.003113351,0.0003019798,0.0003203199,0.0000132056,0.000003814539,0.0003097688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944792,0.000005937596,0.003119071,0.002142295,0.0001046284,0.00003718131,0.000007163472,0.000007967979,0.00009658105],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008070262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4030162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04194820553813171,"score_gpt":0.2634896601196778,"score_spread":0.2215414545815461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}