{"id":"W1485612484","doi":"10.24124/c677/2012376","title":"Shifting Mandates and Climate Change Policy Capacity: The Forestry Case","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Climate change; Government (linguistics); Public policy; Business; Climate policy; Adaptation (eye); Climate change adaptation; Natural resource economics; Political science; Economic policy; Public administration; Economics; Economic growth","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01090009,0.0004444223,0.0006382397,0.001754297,0.01780995,0.009071988,0.002492805,0.007656685,0.01320049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01975672,0.0005794543,0.001009412,0.002550683,0.02233593,0.007246099,0.01089816,0.009296371,0.0005849408],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0286329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03170485,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2060169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2167502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9863366,0.004733349,0.0002380091,0.001000839,0.00166881,0.006022423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858056,0.008696501,0.000904484,0.001093445,0.001377158,0.002122717],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001845006,0.00004049195,0.001217982,0.00001956366,0.000009482877,0.0002850439,0.001849387,0.002036122,0.00007648358,0.9910209,0.001675527,0.00175047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000304363,0.0000967453,0.006411056,0.0003832947,0.00008127379,0.000364428,0.01609279,0.008489183,0.0008771896,0.7771059,0.1896472,0.0001466215],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1966902,0.00161466,0.004257129,0.05814405,0.0002320784,0.0001773683,0.0001526464,0.00006790958,0.738664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831203,0.0003360253,0.0005205536,0.004074535,0.0001155107,0.0001309751,0.00002390887,0.00001323197,0.01166484],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9713671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4096355,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1951468000090926,"score_gpt":0.3132001847563761,"score_spread":0.1180533847472835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}