{"id":"W1485761871","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00376.x","title":"Institutional adaptation as a governability problem in fisheries: patron–client relations in the Junagadh fishery, India","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fish and Fisheries","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Adaptation (eye); Adaptability; Psychological resilience; Resilience (materials science); Fisheries management; Perspective (graphical); Business; Fisheries law; Order (exchange); Fishery; Political science; Environmental resource management; Economics; Biology; Management; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Fishing; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003410094,0.0001378508,0.0001448927,0.00002661766,0.0002351634,0.00008199318,0.0001538595,0.00008223802,0.000791351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001904591,0.0001037829,0.00003345779,0.0002736727,0.0003056256,0.0005443093,0.0001843394,0.0003108199,0.00003899145],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008631493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002984962,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006610029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.135925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989183,0.00005863758,0.000280979,0.0002839,0.0002337039,0.0002245038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996086,0.00009585595,0.00007041686,0.0001715166,0.00000981202,0.00004381147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000253711,0.00008853557,0.9786761,0.00001461115,0.000003279803,0.000007312863,0.00488331,0.00001574192,0.00002212361,0.0005607103,0.01003253,0.005670349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002507018,0.00005740692,0.8414543,0.000009462302,0.00000361282,0.00001097468,0.001272226,0.0001058458,0.000003240443,0.003700774,0.1530159,0.0001155011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9311558,0.00000979337,0.000007761745,0.006100281,0.0001813276,0.0003857323,0.00002227169,0.0000208651,0.06211615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997959,0.000026696,0.0003081667,0.0005318164,0.00004315144,0.000193939,0.00002478716,0.000005552984,0.0009068932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1429834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009513099866089902,"score_gpt":0.1875272300746833,"score_spread":0.1780141302085934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}