{"id":"W1485976064","doi":"10.1023/a:1025502030803","title":"Opportunities for Improved Risk Assessments of Exotic Species in Canada Using Bioclimatic Modeling","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Introduced species; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Process (computing); Geography; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental planning; Computer science; Environmental science; Biology; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002343231,0.0001682663,0.0002105556,0.00003171029,0.0001361359,0.00002182456,0.00008239339,0.0000336458,0.001060732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000103937,0.0001701441,0.00003848394,0.00005746378,0.00007192117,0.0001282688,0.00007790956,0.0001045273,9.97085e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003002733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007531844,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08251032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01467833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988359,0.00005965061,0.0003246723,0.0002486925,0.0002347212,0.0002963927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995667,0.00005199855,0.0001391897,0.0001441462,0.000002089102,0.00009587679],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001303358,0.0001589936,0.9445832,0.00004789666,0.00002969111,0.000007668002,0.00008885955,0.005289854,0.04696645,0.0001478896,0.00002167697,0.002644731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002192273,0.0001973507,0.7604295,0.0001217247,0.0001207573,0.00001755087,0.07638836,0.1452627,0.01239833,0.0003646406,0.001674119,0.0008326595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970152,0.00009745075,0.0009329044,0.00001721199,0.0002310431,0.0002562888,0.0001422463,0.000005869949,0.001301758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961264,0.0005984432,0.00310197,0.000009863797,0.00001315447,0.00003349312,0.000018013,0.00001484163,0.00008384491],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1841538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.118056700571375,"score_gpt":0.2902152027532816,"score_spread":0.1721585021819066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}