{"id":"W1486237550","doi":"","title":"ASYMMETRY AND COLLUSION IN INFINITELY REPEATED CONTESTS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Collusion; Economics; Aggregate (composite); Microeconomics; Rent-seeking; Information asymmetry; Contrast (vision); Repeated game; Complete information; Econometrics; Asymmetry; Game theory; Computer science; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003268016,0.0003133565,0.0006842372,0.0007832001,0.0004081892,0.0002423729,0.0005990221,0.0006340917,0.00008176634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008588671,0.0003872347,0.00009918652,0.0002356008,0.001121628,0.0002019498,0.002028244,0.001585723,0.00001609353],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003258016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007518063,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007096519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05197234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996411,0.0005545237,0.0008169531,0.001022007,0.000260138,0.0009353246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982026,0.0006965272,0.0002189293,0.0005327941,0.0001008423,0.0002482771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003011462,0.0006373076,0.6053233,0.0001085299,0.00008732195,0.0001424435,0.02805726,0.0009805935,0.0005296894,0.004659853,0.0001661201,0.3590065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01073527,0.0009582142,0.6045114,0.003300753,0.0000638257,0.00002638049,0.1439906,0.006568938,0.002126687,0.01583395,0.2055115,0.006372448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7686836,0.0006297331,5.100664e-8,0.0007834727,0.0002728658,0.0008993607,0.00003160819,0.0000395764,0.2286597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669718,0.02998006,0.0003855741,0.0001066436,0.0001974225,0.0002383944,0.00002359614,0.00004629789,0.002050173],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.352634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0633196086410843,"score_gpt":0.3965092303835726,"score_spread":0.3331896217424882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}