{"id":"W1486854714","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01737.x","title":"Inference from habitat‐selection analysis depends on foraging strategies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Animal Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Russian Science Foundation","keywords":"Foraging; Selection (genetic algorithm); Habitat; Inference; Computer science; Ecology; Process (computing); Geography; Artificial intelligence; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008470469,0.0007672558,0.001289893,0.00116023,0.0004368796,0.001241794,0.001307864,0.0008014487,0.001671734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0577137,0.0005505206,0.001543301,0.00101814,0.001282707,0.001318589,0.001003915,0.0009932138,0.0003592763],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006485435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005825809,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006402532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005118967,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964367,0.002489183,0.0002069482,0.0004782478,0.000291005,0.00009793972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9385865,0.05494433,0.002099107,0.003342037,0.0006529648,0.0003750137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004486884,0.0001371179,0.2033,0.0003903098,0.001528067,0.0003238887,0.0003872354,0.6763133,0.004484087,0.01641209,0.001615028,0.09466018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003898376,0.00005691513,0.026044,0.00003419785,0.00007771064,0.0000965521,0.00004189085,0.9429058,0.0006800487,0.02956039,0.0004349768,0.00002852064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4664561,0.0002640981,0.5294648,0.0003226129,0.00002604033,0.00008295561,0.0004586321,0.0005022635,0.00242253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9560226,0.000121911,0.0429288,0.00009895714,0.00002596572,0.00007823407,0.0004861977,0.00005262656,0.0001847749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008470469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04479671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01076822545804398,"score_gpt":0.2553194798661708,"score_spread":0.2445512544081268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}