{"id":"W1486871773","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3893","title":"Govier’s Distinguishing A Priori from Inductive Arguments by Analogy: Implications for a General Theory of Ground Adequacy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Warrant; Ceteris paribus; A priori and a posteriori; Intuition; Epistemology; Property (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Inductive reasoning; Defeasible estate; Defeasible reasoning; Mathematics; Philosophy; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002405142,0.0001438866,0.0002515803,0.00004394822,0.0002897993,0.0001076478,0.0002307758,0.0000947352,0.0001988363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002171126,0.0001159339,0.0001036256,0.00003300035,0.0004125961,0.0005714197,0.00006295853,0.0001889709,0.0000326938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003013859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005114519,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001975676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002222921,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990612,0.00004940993,0.0003842242,0.0001579624,0.00008505923,0.0002620974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987889,0.0003166455,0.0002982143,0.0002100688,0.000327765,0.00005839276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001664204,0.00006226102,0.001176578,0.00002954939,0.0001011052,1.031881e-7,0.02114851,0.000001572434,0.0003603888,0.9680325,0.001496158,0.007574586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006554465,0.0002677873,0.02167685,0.00002624102,0.0001016931,0.000001087839,0.005949993,0.00007011188,0.0001566409,0.8764571,0.09432935,0.0003076835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9198047,0.0002957443,0.002467245,0.0005940525,0.0006386429,0.0007689918,0.0008278798,0.00006466242,0.07453811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936803,0.00001224904,0.001178744,0.001095078,0.0005886568,0.0001808817,0.0003335013,0.00001359852,0.002916992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09283319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4727648,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08940304955744048,"score_gpt":0.29413801357619,"score_spread":0.2047349640187495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}