{"id":"W1487359857","doi":"10.1108/oth-05-2015-0019","title":"Eating words: a discourse historical analysis of the public debate over India’s 2013 National Food Security Act","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"On the Horizon The International Journal of Learning Futures","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Electronic Arts (Canada); University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Newspaper; Context (archaeology); Critical discourse analysis; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Situated; Discourse analysis; Originality; Discipline; Politics; Social science; Ideology; Media studies; Political science; Linguistics; Law; Qualitative research; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005583946,0.0006523401,0.0003564731,0.008292473,0.008558909,0.01215668,0.001390241,0.001878257,0.004702524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01316889,0.0004060667,0.0003666664,0.009412513,0.01676967,0.01052078,0.004708904,0.00325558,0.0006546488],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005167748,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0126756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01904514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952159,0.003184737,0.0001704834,0.000375584,0.0007037401,0.000349546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853113,0.01160914,0.0009716616,0.0006674082,0.001022175,0.0004184709],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006608493,0.0000351196,0.00215652,0.000298706,0.000007835548,0.0007771948,0.9082859,0.0001049955,0.0007605168,0.06597566,0.004061614,0.01746989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005866737,0.00002592597,0.004853958,0.0006480992,0.00002169531,0.0003130045,0.8107144,0.0003637286,0.00117891,0.01127225,0.1705665,0.00003558019],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7538733,0.006550735,0.01232365,0.02064936,0.0009665299,0.000457153,0.001837789,0.0001747798,0.2031668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836759,0.002010386,0.004004183,0.0009595396,0.0001872873,0.0002030662,0.0006497962,0.0001391358,0.008170831],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0126756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08254635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06039317700775678,"score_gpt":0.4046193165710493,"score_spread":0.3442261395632925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}