{"id":"W1488788462","doi":"","title":"Scholarly Metrics under the Microscope: From Citation Analysis to Academic Auditing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Reputation; Audit; Documentation; Library science; Dimension (graph theory); Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Mathematics; Accounting; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02599762,0.001585371,0.001956671,0.02223462,0.003028918,0.02375704,0.001895882,0.003260186,0.00595491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09205406,0.001840745,0.0005983268,0.03579922,0.01346472,0.03309538,0.00577309,0.006906833,0.004709132],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005478966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009699151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006179414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006348104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9728469,0.01353787,0.00216299,0.001001773,0.009903798,0.0005466309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9017996,0.06982587,0.007659569,0.003858315,0.01471667,0.00213995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003647159,0.00003937254,0.002235513,0.001687363,0.00005441209,0.00007535159,0.00555146,0.0006930972,0.0001971297,0.08667491,0.2894386,0.6133163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000198782,0.00008385003,0.005701085,0.007490122,0.00004290269,0.0002659595,0.007868318,0.001876605,0.0006101695,0.2815696,0.6943052,0.000166172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00294458,0.7665071,0.03852618,0.1506136,0.0108057,0.0001211033,0.0004013715,0.000971018,0.02910932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07048739,0.8158331,0.06004784,0.01024996,0.01908678,0.0004749016,0.000470347,0.0009425274,0.02240716],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9777654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1374902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6638953583953724,"score_gpt":0.5733188140237518,"score_spread":0.09057654437162055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}