{"id":"W1488788462","doi":"","title":"Scholarly Metrics under the Microscope: From Citation Analysis to Academic Auditing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Reputation; Audit; Documentation; Library science; Dimension (graph theory); Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Mathematics; Accounting; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06336895,0.00008136334,0.0001718208,0.03449224,0.00115778,0.01662398,0.001469234,0.0001173157,0.00009858706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1060135,0.00004051841,0.00006061346,0.1054162,0.0003008348,0.04249504,0.0002607655,0.001440297,0.00008372542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000675764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002234519,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001517922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002380211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920554,0.001726727,0.0007524616,0.0001472942,0.004896035,0.0004220424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736465,0.01943874,0.0005586473,0.0003385638,0.00431995,0.001697558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007173431,0.00004332859,0.2234334,0.00001570636,0.0009416488,0.00004714281,0.04242207,0.002942492,0.00009173308,0.1202996,0.3985836,0.210462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003565802,0.0002164533,0.09925648,0.00001303994,0.0000764373,0.00003835211,0.06608954,0.00241581,0.0001562017,0.01398759,0.8172839,0.0001095902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6304858,0.006686303,0.002271763,0.3393835,0.0003021449,0.0003366775,0.00003558203,0.000005124759,0.02049308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992002,0.0007828813,0.0006405539,0.005858164,0.0001581981,0.000003040696,0.000006243524,0.000003976189,0.0005449857],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4187004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9843969,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6638953583953724,"score_gpt":0.5733188140237518,"score_spread":0.09057654437162055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}