{"id":"W1488807027","doi":"10.17269/cjph.106.4828","title":"Risk perception, psychological heuristics and the water fluoridation controversy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Public Health","topic":"Fluoride Effects and Removal","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Water fluoridation; Credibility; Risk perception; Environmental health; Public health; Government (linguistics); Psychology; Referendum; Perception; Scientific evidence; Fluoride; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Politics; Law; Nursing; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01026267,0.000277672,0.0004565437,0.001568519,0.002920281,0.007209693,0.000897944,0.005360547,0.003749779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05158902,0.0004459922,0.0004139935,0.001109123,0.01636933,0.005253785,0.002483707,0.004178329,0.0001493286],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00357765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002817031,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01820546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01216055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950336,0.002907892,0.0001911549,0.0003742243,0.001103086,0.000389888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9372051,0.05032212,0.006797538,0.001864693,0.00237424,0.00143637],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001365826,0.001306282,0.1179893,0.0005149007,0.0003017385,0.001793087,0.1032676,0.003494719,0.002090718,0.6676392,0.01023977,0.08999695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000419431,0.0002105627,0.09120036,0.0003107831,0.0001757117,0.0009044638,0.05983347,0.004668142,0.0005176761,0.8193073,0.02223596,0.0002162229],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8072854,0.004442676,0.005774423,0.08034261,0.0002396517,0.00005761765,0.00007642013,0.00002136441,0.1017597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964911,0.0004347327,0.0004446077,0.002131601,0.00008094579,0.000009078983,0.00001384229,0.000004313769,0.0003897606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9817945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0542748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03009107247902188,"score_gpt":0.2673743619219982,"score_spread":0.2372832894429763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}