{"id":"W1489258067","doi":"","title":"A comparison of three methods for the in situ determination of acoustic absorption coefficients","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian acoustics","topic":"Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Surface (topology); Impulse (physics); Materials science; Attenuation coefficient; Acoustics; Absorption (acoustics); Reflection (computer programming); Reflection coefficient; Impulse response; Optics; Geometry; Physics; Mathematical analysis; Mathematics; Composite material; Computer science; Classical mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008626808,0.001915683,0.001393037,0.003166241,0.0008501873,0.001455063,0.003001147,0.002076715,0.00164586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0212176,0.001376993,0.00102006,0.002275388,0.0008462403,0.00207317,0.001345561,0.001725613,0.0009877745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006908074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007227706,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001982569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00376631,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9912102,0.00212529,0.0005014848,0.001157827,0.004725659,0.0002795843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778658,0.01176325,0.001761357,0.002155019,0.006187038,0.0002675689],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002694761,0.0007557014,0.01291827,0.002584648,0.0006920149,0.0001900809,0.001391915,0.003203311,0.7714671,0.001716427,0.0007762993,0.2016094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001625224,0.003110282,0.01562032,0.0001902745,0.0009015675,0.001566609,0.0006753762,0.02350323,0.9434122,0.0008196502,0.009699301,0.0003386351],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2072462,0.00652366,0.7788249,0.000204447,0.0007555942,0.000691632,0.0004801539,0.001134525,0.004138965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2995906,0.006805126,0.6849683,0.0002503641,0.0002267878,0.001370677,0.0007410175,0.0005436381,0.005503472],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008626808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04562342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04874269245009142,"score_gpt":0.3605283356688412,"score_spread":0.3117856432187497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}