{"id":"W1489476036","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.00429.x","title":"The tale of the tails: Canadian income inequality in the 1980s and 1990s","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Economic inequality; Income distribution; Income inequality metrics; Inequality; Distribution (mathematics); Gross income; Income shares; State income tax; Survey data collection; Income tax; Demographic economics; Adjusted gross income; Labour economics; Public economics; Tax reform","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009650238,0.0002484714,0.000388399,0.00504455,0.004649162,0.002013091,0.0008248849,0.0003895749,0.004250189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00333057,0.0001657136,0.0003528756,0.01126261,0.001538866,0.0009373316,0.001389817,0.001037527,0.0001539028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05113956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03584399,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992945,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989828,0.00003652035,0.0000208378,0.00009599411,0.0004112653,0.0004526221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969054,0.0002134804,0.0004425426,0.00009551096,0.001856501,0.0004864915],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003537661,0.00005546476,0.8410669,0.0002033594,0.0001248985,0.0003471682,0.01635929,0.00104435,0.0005014971,0.01764666,0.03290855,0.08938811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004484254,0.000008278633,0.9815725,0.00008573076,0.00001890393,0.00002776007,0.003488492,0.00037205,0.0001568853,0.0004980514,0.01374409,0.0000227307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9268891,0.006855268,0.0003896034,0.01043044,0.00007335428,0.00002984327,0.01571891,0.0000390813,0.03957435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940307,0.001351452,0.0001343322,0.0002930609,0.00001425076,0.00000533106,0.00170088,0.000007511623,0.002462666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05113956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3710452,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1024582331875343,"score_gpt":0.2347127820418947,"score_spread":0.1322545488543604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}