{"id":"W1490123602","doi":"10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01867.x","title":"System of Systems Engineering and Risk Management of Extreme Events: Concepts and Case Study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risk Analysis","topic":"Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk management; System of systems; Computer science; Complex system; Risk management framework; Risk assessment; Systems design; Engineering; Systems engineering; IT risk management; Computer security; Business; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00663899,0.0008199481,0.000606789,0.002483877,0.002324721,0.004400944,0.001446565,0.002767642,0.00300472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007291939,0.000334778,0.0008991328,0.002594206,0.005364199,0.003939969,0.00425368,0.002296832,0.0003312672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00289525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003061441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003140209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002206301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934462,0.004319713,0.0003219416,0.0003374569,0.001266735,0.0003080842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938962,0.004219798,0.0006119996,0.0004839499,0.0005817029,0.000206396],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001433543,0.0003838929,0.01089446,0.00069393,0.000102701,0.004854735,0.010996,0.09853992,0.003373288,0.7918793,0.004465749,0.07367258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001264394,0.0009531506,0.006449346,0.0008893459,0.0001279511,0.005529808,0.02049245,0.3748459,0.006667315,0.469925,0.1137565,0.000236733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1482381,0.002638124,0.7893378,0.004188812,0.0001505032,0.001404119,0.0002646118,0.0002476133,0.05353035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.725357,0.002228476,0.2652665,0.0002564117,0.00008023204,0.0009376611,0.0001079427,0.00003778248,0.005727952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00663899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03511077,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01261778288943956,"score_gpt":0.2355316648724038,"score_spread":0.2229138819829642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}