{"id":"W1491751047","doi":"10.3989/scimar.2003.67s175","title":"Quality of fisheries data and uncertainty in stock assessment","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientia Marina","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Maine Sea Grant, University of Maine","keywords":"Stock assessment; Stock (firearms); Fishery; Quality (philosophy); Business; Environmental science; Geography; Biology; Fishing; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0923825,0.0006557041,0.0009113915,0.004589923,0.000992189,0.00499713,0.001553608,0.002380112,0.000872733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3623107,0.0005262633,0.001094431,0.00542356,0.003676372,0.005438094,0.003089983,0.00154234,0.0001798995],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003259481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002199248,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0100293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006265055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.929905,0.03962715,0.006764063,0.002999218,0.01964562,0.001058972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5180734,0.4127066,0.03622566,0.014022,0.01818913,0.0007833621],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006029522,0.0001534329,0.43718,0.001180949,0.001074401,0.0009007677,0.001956816,0.3232705,0.001358719,0.0630516,0.001328786,0.1679412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001016616,0.0008898151,0.2220026,0.002262496,0.0008998087,0.001338736,0.0027785,0.4910782,0.01094571,0.2549076,0.01224963,0.0005452325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5685644,0.008476226,0.3993765,0.007871985,0.0003079571,0.000543406,0.001459462,0.0002266407,0.0131734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9485922,0.001337379,0.04870874,0.0003138435,0.0001136381,0.0001185079,0.000384813,0.00004250717,0.0003883519],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0923825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4885712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06234332812848834,"score_gpt":0.3443888439476865,"score_spread":0.2820455158191982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}