{"id":"W1492243286","doi":"10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00384.x","title":"Network Meta‐Analysis for Evaluating Interventions in Implant Dentistry: The Case of Peri‐Implantitis Treatment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","topic":"Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Meta-analysis; Peri-implantitis; Confidence interval; Randomized controlled trial; Dentistry; Relative risk; Clinical trial; Random effects model; Implant; Surgery; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1460121,0.004637145,0.01851838,0.01326294,0.0009917511,0.004954244,0.003873587,0.004029749,0.005126139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3093322,0.001680854,0.03728971,0.008695755,0.001372429,0.003921963,0.004006313,0.003706899,0.000357852],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003280908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003808333,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003722533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00415272,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6845866,0.2911208,0.01104656,0.005813491,0.006694434,0.0007381795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6837611,0.2954118,0.009020886,0.008384169,0.002770433,0.0006515729],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039364,0.0000545028,0.008253627,0.0920054,0.8356512,0.0004262379,0.0001735507,0.01410946,0.0002128696,0.004255539,0.00208108,0.03884023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003790903,0.001187501,0.008660453,0.01905056,0.8870867,0.0005001122,0.00020235,0.03551507,0.0004513111,0.03504249,0.008313539,0.0001988994],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01344515,0.8512739,0.1206067,0.0051571,0.002255642,0.003102112,0.001686695,0.0003448806,0.002127728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5352833,0.2281646,0.2080722,0.003678469,0.002295916,0.0189836,0.00199292,0.0003063655,0.001222644],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8539879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.772195,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7095388937428829,"score_gpt":0.6202376109333687,"score_spread":0.08930128280951422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}