{"id":"W1492651800","doi":"10.18533/journal.v3i3.388","title":"Youth Stakeholders in Neighbourhood Revitalization: A Case Example","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Neighbourhood (mathematics); Participatory action research; Youth engagement; Youth participation; Positive Youth Development; Community engagement; Citizen journalism; Public relations; The arts; Civic engagement; Sociology; Process (computing); Action research; Community participation; Psychology; Political science; Pedagogy; Developmental psychology; Socioeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002739574,0.0005471851,0.000504459,0.001075526,0.01896682,0.003789923,0.002072716,0.003431109,0.004425589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003233195,0.0003708968,0.0007692439,0.00135604,0.003902473,0.00202679,0.008459534,0.0027922,0.00052371],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004365481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005860356,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04116521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1218408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967586,0.002002804,0.00007823482,0.0001459315,0.000300717,0.0007136951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984267,0.0004669062,0.0001242818,0.0001074366,0.000220719,0.0006540261],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001019929,0.000674536,0.02245256,0.0005560199,0.00003312952,0.07187068,0.8139707,0.001127904,0.001342991,0.02417737,0.00961709,0.054075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001662419,0.0003558978,0.006550668,0.000382157,0.00003007417,0.008060767,0.8575004,0.0007011148,0.001062727,0.00292196,0.1223788,0.00003888166],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9205899,0.0009985756,0.004838876,0.007065414,0.0002029277,0.0004831021,0.0001010158,0.0001066963,0.0656136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801711,0.0008603277,0.002724691,0.0005756616,0.0000353746,0.0001632474,0.00004881443,0.00003543264,0.01538523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04116521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08185118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.529833153149703,"score_gpt":0.4974138263498856,"score_spread":0.03241932679981741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}