{"id":"W1492691778","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2011.00186.x","title":"Mislabeling marine protected areas and why it matters—a case study of Australia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Marine protected area; IUCN protected area categories; Protected area; National park; Fishing; Recreation; Environmental resource management; Geography; Government (linguistics); Marine conservation; Fishery; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Political science; Ecology; Environmental science; Law; Biology; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001213537,0.00009056268,0.00009108339,0.00003380068,0.0000548832,0.0000150113,0.00009446135,0.00002479544,0.002646434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002623193,0.00009220621,0.00001349926,0.00009989295,0.0001026561,0.0001925665,0.0001138883,0.0000655865,0.00004670852],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003614495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000164855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0474525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002261886,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992698,0.00005289668,0.0002136705,0.000187763,0.0001702577,0.0001055474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996774,0.00003224349,0.00009852951,0.0001385705,0.00001933214,0.00003388991],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004197899,0.0002001992,0.9465134,0.00001959622,0.00003881419,0.000501889,0.004212466,0.00002877523,0.03560818,0.00005159877,0.01255722,0.0002258962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001529564,0.0002477288,0.9852984,0.000042325,0.00006303578,0.0005929192,0.001826777,0.0009810168,0.006122575,0.0002362483,0.002701754,0.0003576509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934909,6.349591e-7,0.0001279095,0.005591104,0.00004519021,0.0003788878,0.000002091744,0.00002138905,0.000341898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904975,2.495631e-7,0.002775803,0.006318307,0.00001068695,0.00002975775,0.000003858241,0.000008348435,0.0003554887],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04519062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982653,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05063313979631246,"score_gpt":0.2577987410082025,"score_spread":0.2071656012118901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}