{"id":"W1493032675","doi":"10.1109/rams.2006.1677445","title":"Availability optimization using spares modeling and the six sigma process","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dow Chemical (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Spare part; Six Sigma; Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Process (computing); Productivity; Computer science; Production (economics); Manufacturing engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Industrial engineering; Operations research; Operations management; Engineering; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001058589,0.0006529469,0.0006354186,0.0006447159,0.0003609868,0.001114521,0.0007940646,0.000774272,0.001931191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002000331,0.000496567,0.0009183314,0.0005398001,0.0006997475,0.001132842,0.0007724602,0.0007457774,0.0002862803],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009347996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001069712,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004744972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002515808,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994583,0.0002650535,0.00001954864,0.00004637639,0.0001571963,0.00005357699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992734,0.000475903,0.00009703436,0.00004334066,0.0000845492,0.00002575123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001273322,0.00000834899,0.0001234523,0.00001185817,0.000008044674,0.00001504133,0.00002725727,0.9813384,0.0002807633,0.0148605,0.00007485974,0.003238753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000343288,0.00001260469,0.00003027974,0.000005389107,0.000003483938,0.000006069199,0.000008407898,0.9887224,0.0002311304,0.0105758,0.0003971932,0.000003686168],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02970993,0.0002996202,0.9624469,0.0003234264,0.00002352494,0.00002802066,0.00003750916,0.0001678426,0.006963233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8875363,0.0007705016,0.1053883,0.00008242521,0.00003285221,0.0001094115,0.00009871557,0.00007908573,0.005902319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004744972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0094347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008503405439051863,"score_gpt":0.2016435011115372,"score_spread":0.1931400956724853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}