{"id":"W1493032675","doi":"10.1109/rams.2006.1677445","title":"Availability optimization using spares modeling and the six sigma process","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dow Chemical (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Spare part; Six Sigma; Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Process (computing); Productivity; Computer science; Production (economics); Manufacturing engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Industrial engineering; Operations research; Operations management; Engineering; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002214537,0.00008681083,0.00009994926,0.00002133499,0.0001422539,0.0000449828,0.00005097608,0.00004730435,0.00003262009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004990103,0.0000588972,0.00002052964,0.0001098838,0.00006653881,0.0002147627,0.00001827499,0.00005952085,6.825901e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003162436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008589795,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001634922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003372557,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994657,0.00001919068,0.0001827817,0.0001271527,0.00008105785,0.0001241028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997317,0.00003540541,0.00001623016,0.0001292642,0.00007068093,0.00001676987],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001141987,0.00000609459,0.0002641473,0.00004276386,0.000002914905,7.441751e-8,0.0001012121,0.9986546,0.00002676839,0.0007987995,0.00001488416,0.00007633636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003118709,0.000002617588,0.00001916224,0.00001096337,0.00001059268,0.000001655607,0.00008308046,0.9973254,0.0001576735,0.001983423,0.00001172233,0.00008190413],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2063308,0.0001294266,0.7899016,0.00007475365,0.00004963636,0.0001951415,8.156284e-7,0.0001435405,0.003174297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979768,0.00005313209,0.02004852,0.00001993716,0.0000399914,0.00001062803,0.000005587653,0.00001313655,0.00004101795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7734373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2401758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008503405439051863,"score_gpt":0.2016435011115372,"score_spread":0.1931400956724853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}