{"id":"W1493293603","doi":"10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00228.x","title":"Using the Lashof Accounting Methodology to Assess Carbon Mitigation Projects With Life Cycle Assessment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Danmarks Tekniske Universitet","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Life-cycle assessment; Context (archaeology); Environmental science; Carbon accounting; Climate change; Industrial ecology; Climate change mitigation; Radiative forcing; Environmental resource management; Unit (ring theory); Accounting method; Environmental economics; Business; Accounting; Production (economics); Sustainability; Economics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003000646,0.0001391301,0.000297352,0.00006749894,0.0001698429,0.00004306995,0.0003057256,0.0002342906,0.0004424315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001199514,0.00008710639,0.00006070658,0.0002511458,0.0002717568,0.000254354,0.0001747523,0.0009237789,0.000003253859],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000490749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002766339,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003221424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006992259,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998166,0.0005422058,0.0004469287,0.0001748572,0.0003320693,0.0003378852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986358,0.0004516377,0.000503313,0.0001945984,0.00003342647,0.0001812666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001539407,0.0001266917,0.931215,0.000002343606,0.00003883254,0.00002348201,0.0004093995,0.01439649,0.05109167,0.00004206595,0.0001265197,0.002373603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001823765,0.001394363,0.9817006,0.00001434297,0.0001372114,0.0003526906,0.003678554,0.002609472,0.006442007,0.0005538553,0.001023368,0.0002697969],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954426,0.000001378317,0.000520352,0.001866666,0.0007374389,0.0003877506,9.505616e-7,0.000005633572,0.00103724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855148,8.013813e-7,0.0135389,0.0004998822,0.0004031064,0.000006849532,4.395045e-7,0.00001268941,0.00002252794],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0504856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4844314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1181834693986404,"score_gpt":0.3643795791623141,"score_spread":0.2461961097636737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}