{"id":"W1493293603","doi":"10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00228.x","title":"Using the Lashof Accounting Methodology to Assess Carbon Mitigation Projects With Life Cycle Assessment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Danmarks Tekniske Universitet","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Life-cycle assessment; Context (archaeology); Environmental science; Carbon accounting; Climate change; Industrial ecology; Climate change mitigation; Radiative forcing; Environmental resource management; Unit (ring theory); Accounting method; Environmental economics; Business; Accounting; Production (economics); Sustainability; Economics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003381596,0.0008408392,0.0004793187,0.002807199,0.0005403506,0.00156114,0.0006759212,0.0004934229,0.001882032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00701159,0.0002351466,0.0006728028,0.002040302,0.0002680506,0.002479562,0.0008156963,0.00035694,0.0001190113],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001779717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002138726,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02265988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02811475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987987,0.0005047259,0.00007319334,0.00008090955,0.0004019047,0.0001405676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984798,0.0006988046,0.0002527126,0.000128568,0.0003876772,0.00005242969],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001931827,0.0001046313,0.02336446,0.0001562759,0.0003158835,0.0001465944,0.0001633165,0.6791201,0.002439503,0.05131561,0.001764063,0.2409164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002005959,0.0001504086,0.008833136,0.00003955261,0.000109523,0.00005015397,0.0001393498,0.9609642,0.002574826,0.02307232,0.003994356,0.00005223689],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.5866197,0.0009163559,0.3791425,0.0004874331,0.00008124121,0.0003354301,0.001310774,0.0005869226,0.03051958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9203846,0.0003109158,0.07625592,0.00002979971,0.00001875732,0.0001508437,0.0003088457,0.00004267989,0.00249763],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02265988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04505593,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1181834693986404,"score_gpt":0.3643795791623141,"score_spread":0.2461961097636737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}