{"id":"W1493465670","doi":"10.1017/s0008413100002516","title":"Some linguistic properties of legal notices","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Ambiguity; Directive; Interpretation (philosophy); Representation (politics); Phrase; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005702313,0.0002878074,0.0005092375,0.005159271,0.003471743,0.006332734,0.001290449,0.002220105,0.006403466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0422651,0.0005756186,0.0008002087,0.003445331,0.009422541,0.01538404,0.002929636,0.002763825,0.0004581777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002957799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001197716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002782672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001416239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917168,0.003187549,0.001039663,0.001078288,0.002539394,0.0004383611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9489031,0.03573598,0.005283979,0.003826448,0.005464138,0.000786388],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005908304,0.00003153178,0.00274261,0.0001093194,0.00001257306,0.0003157884,0.008095126,0.0004421521,0.00180071,0.9733534,0.0009012844,0.01213637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003852972,0.00008234494,0.008307999,0.0001612067,0.00004448901,0.001090257,0.006973914,0.01023608,0.002973713,0.9360783,0.03392772,0.00008547442],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4895579,0.00147327,0.304493,0.01063237,0.0005016811,0.0002653839,0.001177396,0.001253257,0.1906459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829783,0.0001697954,0.01386188,0.000175315,0.0002408093,0.00005089876,0.0003222849,0.0001407433,0.002059855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006403466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03015709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01352950252367318,"score_gpt":0.2472227994990346,"score_spread":0.2336932969753614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}