{"id":"W1493608403","doi":"10.1002/jmor.20294","title":"Pectoral fin morphology of batoid fishes (Chondrichthyes: Batoidea): Explaining phylogenetic variation with geometric morphometrics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Morphology","topic":"Ichthyology and Marine Biology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"University of Southampton","keywords":"Morphometrics; Biology; Fish fin; Morphology (biology); Allometry; Dorsal fin; Aspect ratio (aeronautics); Phylogenetics; Chondrichthyes; Phylogenetic tree; Fin; Anatomy; Body proportions; Zoology; Lineage (genetic); Evolutionary biology; Dorsum; Paleontology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Geometry; Genetics; Fishery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003087334,0.000218267,0.0003000163,0.001476052,0.0002451557,0.0003652382,0.0002280574,0.0002143906,0.0009311283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000773078,0.0001717637,0.0002726416,0.0009121207,0.0004856525,0.0002534582,0.0005019861,0.000207297,0.0003764379],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001801925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001245035,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002561688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00422358,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999817,0.00003896167,0.00001675783,0.00007657925,0.00003108568,0.00001960078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996145,0.0000901474,0.0001558787,0.00004657344,0.00004902426,0.00004390208],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001049597,0.0000151071,0.9470409,0.00005147468,0.00008610709,0.0001253723,0.0005229983,0.0004860853,0.03415941,0.0000959942,0.0000862825,0.01722534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.733915e-7,0.00002060779,0.9990488,0.000003253729,0.000008861683,0.0001277835,0.0001062099,0.0004587951,0.0001149212,0.00004502369,0.00006179497,0.000002959428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988065,0.0002103172,0.0006111377,0.00001185422,9.912783e-7,0.000003734661,0.0001129447,0.000008516557,0.0002340472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986022,0.0001207411,0.0009042803,0.000005838461,0.000003382905,0.000006820445,0.0002416692,0.000006920251,0.0001082592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002561688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005093575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009932862747291117,"score_gpt":0.2129196813205489,"score_spread":0.2029868185732578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}