{"id":"W1493729624","doi":"10.1109/pes.2004.1373120","title":"Optimal reactive power allocation in a wind powered doubly-fed induction generator","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004.","topic":"Wind Turbine Control Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"AC power; Converters; Power factor; Control theory (sociology); Induction generator; Compensation (psychology); Power (physics); Power control; Rotor (electric); Generator (circuit theory); Wind power; Computer science; Engineering; Electrical engineering; Control (management); Voltage; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003004281,0.0004911749,0.0004954795,0.0002580423,0.0003129322,0.0009209943,0.0004615324,0.0005494255,0.0009775413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006020843,0.0003769042,0.0001377899,0.0002555753,0.0005040262,0.0003509811,0.0002112429,0.0003218097,0.0002311663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004557647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003133062,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001429657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002057241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998276,0.00005987336,0.00001049541,0.00002707161,0.00005660851,0.00001834852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997897,0.00007848701,0.00006426895,0.0000106312,0.00004261738,0.00001435608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003919833,0.00008458441,0.0005261282,0.0001081833,0.00003502292,0.0002690321,0.00007186799,0.9228809,0.03031819,0.01000742,0.0007013408,0.03460525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004757505,0.0001545223,0.000199667,0.000004358529,0.00001454738,0.00002894514,0.000009015531,0.9950411,0.001563578,0.002546096,0.0003837502,0.000006867163],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3158976,0.0005379739,0.6684623,0.0003552123,0.0001032433,0.0001251453,0.00009025673,0.0005093306,0.01391887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988318,0.00007473915,0.01038848,0.00002104218,0.00001221562,0.0000205347,0.00001338709,0.00001417761,0.001137235],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001429657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003306866,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006459663210952968,"score_gpt":0.2011516134570687,"score_spread":0.1946919502461157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}