{"id":"W1493776495","doi":"10.2527/2004.8272200x","title":"A novel cognitive palatability assessment protocol for dogs1","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Animal Science","topic":"Biochemical and Structural Characterization","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Palatability; Psychology; Preference; Clinical nutrition; Cognition; Food preference; Object (grammar); Beagle; Audiology; Medicine; Food science; Biology; Endocrinology; Computer science; Neuroscience; Internal medicine; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00322828,0.001945798,0.00130912,0.001699338,0.0009638508,0.0007564707,0.001718466,0.001700416,0.007604948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003396358,0.001101067,0.001186116,0.0008810318,0.0008720983,0.001252031,0.001396152,0.002185618,0.003453768],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006137164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001436786,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008326204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00364562,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971777,0.0004541612,0.0004037302,0.0008954396,0.0008494637,0.0002195156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974571,0.000332799,0.0004628806,0.00052352,0.0009520964,0.0002716056],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006198659,0.00796314,0.009411672,0.00159606,0.0001322979,0.0007838737,0.001428298,0.001407445,0.7912279,0.002920498,0.01204024,0.1648899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001887619,0.07898758,0.1516769,0.000637159,0.0008276798,0.004627517,0.0006002201,0.02054757,0.565929,0.003646688,0.1697791,0.0008529476],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.3318451,0.002156772,0.5710456,0.0008383029,0.0008025735,0.05915267,0.007098113,0.005559701,0.02150113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1628577,0.001676563,0.6994789,0.001027868,0.0001678887,0.1045057,0.008273734,0.000703754,0.02130791],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007604948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02544111,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02684085690871837,"score_gpt":0.3643971419400439,"score_spread":0.3375562850313255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}