{"id":"W1494567756","doi":"","title":"Program comprehension with dynamic recovery of code collaboration patterns and roles","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legacy system; COBOL; Program comprehension; Computer science; Maintainability; Software maintenance; Software engineering; Legacy code; Artifact (error); Source code; Software development; Software system; Software quality; Code (set theory); Programming language; Software; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005507315,0.0001804514,0.0003622441,0.0001930299,0.0002694088,0.00008042356,0.0006527909,0.00005176046,6.895116e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00192209,0.000119693,0.0000352522,0.001610174,0.0005183802,0.0003051076,0.0004175317,0.0002291381,6.786426e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002404409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000588459,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005427082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006552826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978632,0.0002017233,0.0002830327,0.0004495349,0.0008068379,0.0003956209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921881,0.001587788,0.0001729439,0.000557671,0.005420514,0.00007297527],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007452231,0.003807458,0.03063252,0.006131753,0.002281232,0.00003372575,0.0620991,0.3004059,0.09717482,0.2025478,0.0009735693,0.2864599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01699263,0.02322209,0.06255884,0.01120358,0.00007609813,0.000008576068,0.06759596,0.03456486,0.7452856,0.03377863,0.003084135,0.001628993],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729919,0.0009543646,0.01803713,0.004371219,0.0001940499,0.003158534,0.0001897545,0.00007595036,0.00002710506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808754,0.0005878743,0.01819669,0.000005491308,0.000007966639,0.0002063936,0.000004072266,0.0000147595,0.0001013066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6481108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4880939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04702776759363301,"score_gpt":0.3754114805347369,"score_spread":0.3283837129411039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}