{"id":"W1495012970","doi":"10.22230/jem.2008v9n2a394","title":"An old-growth index for Douglas-fir stands in portions of the Interior Douglas-fir zone, central British Columbia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecosystems and Management","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Seral community; Douglas fir; Basal area; Canopy; Index (typography); Stand development; Forestry; Old-growth forest; Complexity index; Site index; Geography; Tree (set theory); Ecology; Mathematics; Biology; Archaeology; Ecological succession; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002929385,0.0002908006,0.000158944,0.002417631,0.0006682348,0.0006517945,0.0003571637,0.00009634924,0.001144731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007056294,0.0001121859,0.00008235536,0.002004686,0.0002068476,0.0002157605,0.000242633,0.0001890904,0.0002331347],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003339969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002224176,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7775127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9586561,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997655,0.00001549346,0.00002254219,0.00002943984,0.0001252947,0.00004185003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990276,0.00004878194,0.0001381721,0.00003160454,0.0005836755,0.0001701959],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008800058,0.00004426905,0.9322484,0.00007080992,0.0000313843,0.0001448133,0.0003189105,0.001083225,0.002540206,0.0001858844,0.004444219,0.05879979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003449621,0.00001315649,0.9948649,0.00001370991,0.000009421224,0.00006036047,0.0002276616,0.001092822,0.0004065802,0.00003253838,0.003267802,0.000007592594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745378,0.0008034869,0.002854402,0.00005675619,0.00002208798,0.0001010861,0.00968628,0.0001505828,0.01178765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800017,0.0003423975,0.006049517,0.0000225864,0.000006838059,0.00005610014,0.007532192,0.00002128265,0.005967183],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2224873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4475952,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005530697209953721,"score_gpt":0.1943444730962438,"score_spread":0.1888137758862901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}