{"id":"W1495035055","doi":"10.24124/c677/20151200","title":"Explaining Canadian Provincial Voting Behaviour: Nuance or Parsimony?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Political Science Review","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Preference; Politics; Ranked voting system; Positive economics; Econometrics; Empirical research; Economics; Political science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Statistics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01361972,0.001248742,0.00224653,0.003283746,0.003452818,0.004804246,0.003686076,0.00125623,0.004538557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03714445,0.000745512,0.002002579,0.006190183,0.002573024,0.002489928,0.003054173,0.001865936,0.0005145508],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01388619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02395513,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.937059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9438726,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943403,0.002840654,0.0002510311,0.000692895,0.00100366,0.0008713785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819874,0.0130555,0.001226343,0.001600687,0.001554926,0.0005750516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005004334,0.0002195634,0.6656336,0.001121839,0.003697013,0.0007226361,0.008981473,0.06282011,0.0006006974,0.09273896,0.01218815,0.1507757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002614986,0.0002279068,0.4073659,0.000726771,0.002785522,0.0002691903,0.01258244,0.3913155,0.0005277958,0.147602,0.03606695,0.0002685462],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8882316,0.008923085,0.04183233,0.01958144,0.0002109828,0.0003229772,0.004608063,0.0003838066,0.03590562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895551,0.001059724,0.006469552,0.0003666488,0.00005384747,0.00003524997,0.001249064,0.0000355204,0.001175242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06294101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1266233,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1379425207412262,"score_gpt":0.4069328802299149,"score_spread":0.2689903594886887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}