{"id":"W1495880373","doi":"10.5539/jmr.v7n3p178","title":"Engineering Students’ Perception of Financial Mathematics-An empirical study based on the EAPH-MF scale","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematics Research","topic":"Educational Innovations and Technology","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Sample (material); Mathematics education; Test (biology); Mathematics; Perception; Variance (accounting); Relevance (law); Psychology; Geography; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001725166,0.0002197412,0.0002305078,0.0009966466,0.0003222887,0.0007439266,0.0002281925,0.0003978187,0.001552292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006569575,0.0001719045,0.0002535339,0.0005403998,0.0004288791,0.0005955052,0.0005736311,0.0004918423,0.0003326001],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000200315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003072148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005887218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000782826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991671,0.0002416252,0.00007439935,0.00007860911,0.0003080002,0.0001302972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963778,0.001451342,0.0008100473,0.0001530188,0.0006220575,0.0005857335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006882483,0.001046072,0.9778606,0.00003629111,0.0000165369,0.0001294233,0.006460105,0.00006480025,0.001625485,0.0001046216,0.0001284273,0.01245884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007439197,0.0004656359,0.9866702,0.00001642058,0.000009436206,0.0001733062,0.01103083,0.0002806449,0.0005967117,0.0000510135,0.0006898438,0.000008544273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995745,0.000008540159,0.00005105978,0.00001316486,0.000001420008,0.000007667756,0.000008275701,5.049727e-7,0.0003347805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996007,0.0000314561,0.0001164348,0.00001453777,0.000002908483,0.00001396794,0.00002881266,6.410126e-7,0.0001904918],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001725166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009123683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2157447252665958,"score_gpt":0.4674635956601159,"score_spread":0.2517188703935201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}