{"id":"W1496464339","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1851325","title":"On a Three-Alternative Condorcet Jury Theorem","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Mathematical economics; Simple (philosophy); Social choice theory; Jury; Voting; Private information retrieval; Approval voting; Economics; Set (abstract data type); Type (biology); Majority rule; State (computer science); Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00328505,0.0001690697,0.0003161833,0.0001947188,0.0001680229,0.00004439918,0.0004019487,0.000079413,0.0004839157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113327,0.000159757,0.0001590116,0.0001188319,0.00006555966,0.0001586787,0.00002696714,0.001251689,0.001310338],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003974575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001521244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001188349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001266603,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977425,0.00005481056,0.0004756061,0.0002619052,0.00004819074,0.001416992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991332,0.00006533635,0.0004584151,0.0002353784,0.00002944622,0.00007823659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001002898,0.00006642631,0.00345402,0.000003006802,0.0001532584,0.000004476836,0.0006528875,0.000007781413,0.000005769121,0.9941571,0.00004079659,0.001354147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006382754,0.0005255048,0.001077908,0.00001946541,0.000006019835,0.0001518629,0.0003725166,0.0001162602,0.00007469552,0.9959844,0.0008413069,0.0001917346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8124593,0.002117025,0.02313703,0.0001093554,0.0009135734,0.0001669126,0.00001817248,0.00004910885,0.1610296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962452,0.0002945686,0.00003613563,0.0001446372,0.0002900309,0.000006183554,0.000001309579,0.00003087458,0.002951056],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1837859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03514901638564717,"score_gpt":0.2153056123519866,"score_spread":0.1801565959663394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}