{"id":"W1497276413","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1171","title":"Sniffing Out the Ancillary Powers Implications of the Dog Sniff Cases","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Doctrine; Supreme court; Law; Search and seizure; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Economics; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001126124,0.0001014835,0.0002175025,0.00000753307,0.0007673865,0.00004026892,0.0007056107,0.00004010813,0.0001974942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005800751,0.00005686467,0.0002020999,0.0002568571,0.0003890891,0.0001540561,0.00005204526,0.0001244119,0.00003945933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005433253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001693132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001398061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003715148,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986634,0.0002472154,0.0003006232,0.000166565,0.0003698374,0.0002523176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987716,0.0002778961,0.0001562476,0.0005444252,0.0001836198,0.00006617763],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003409111,0.00006383296,0.0009806302,0.0004038819,0.00001908004,0.000003868804,0.001967812,0.000001928219,0.0003062226,0.8928036,0.08041096,0.02303479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002703689,0.00001978122,0.005273365,0.001275762,0.0001019072,0.000009272762,0.0002156277,4.402168e-7,0.00003752079,0.003432186,0.9895142,0.0000928544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01048577,0.2566505,0.00004453309,0.482075,0.0006522422,0.001986114,0.00003652503,0.0001052423,0.247964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.949064,0.04096401,0.00004300305,0.009235074,0.0001250174,0.00001432219,0.000001564943,0.000005319366,0.0005477297],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9385782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5902194,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0795397052487384,"score_gpt":0.3767873164550151,"score_spread":0.2972476112062767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}