{"id":"W1498553531","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00780.x","title":"Negotiation as a style in child protection work","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Child & Family Social Work","topic":"Social Work Education and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Style (visual arts); Identity (music); Work (physics); Reflexivity; Public relations; Child protection; Politics; Service (business); Point (geometry); State (computer science); Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Business; Law; Engineering; Computer science; Aesthetics; Social science; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001033621,0.0001745116,0.0002139849,0.0001367673,0.003759754,0.0001286381,0.0002818996,0.0003280366,0.001610865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006700213,0.0002060299,0.0001286617,0.004446656,0.0002230375,0.0004239238,0.00003508607,0.0006294522,0.001161704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003073453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001997096,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002926133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006670079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977107,0.0007044359,0.0003142973,0.0003450002,0.0004451637,0.0004804007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992449,0.0001168926,0.0002449408,0.0001523265,0.0001035372,0.0001373991],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006292815,0.001119889,0.04680765,0.00001611153,0.00009464502,0.00001463229,0.6021537,0.000003033778,0.000007038112,0.2097856,0.02535198,0.1140164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004046607,0.0000277404,0.6039885,0.00005274376,0.00002551708,7.770615e-7,0.03739674,2.627957e-7,0.000008620445,0.007057923,0.3507169,0.000319582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1710759,0.0003704304,0.0001030243,0.03235544,0.00231992,0.001049026,0.00000153148,0.0002698518,0.7924549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924415,0.00007020652,0.0001742903,0.001845496,0.001665053,0.0001295732,0.000008063536,0.00002925305,0.003636535],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8213657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999616,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05095544561438935,"score_gpt":0.3081327405014779,"score_spread":0.2571772948870886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}