{"id":"W1499753532","doi":"10.15376/biores.7.3.3076-3092","title":"Characterizing Changbai larch through veneering. Part 2: Effect of diameter at breast height and radial growth","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BioResources","topic":"Wood Treatment and Properties","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"FPInnovations","funders":"Chinese Academy of Forestry; FPInnovations; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Pith; Veneer; Larch; Diameter at breast height; Bark (sound); Horticulture; Laminated veneer lumber; Population; Mathematics; Botany; Materials science; Composite material; Forestry; Biology; Medicine; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009364708,0.0001620706,0.0002069441,0.00004287208,0.00005170589,0.00001800975,0.00005908669,0.00006153336,0.00004937889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005783897,0.0001165493,0.00005025248,0.00005929951,0.00005544121,0.0001573715,0.00004870424,0.00005046787,0.00002307974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002120171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001068774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002235916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002387826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993924,0.00003232596,0.0001137929,0.00009566699,0.00009370225,0.000272101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997376,0.0000624907,0.00002274602,0.0001059016,0.00000616537,0.00006509868],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002831945,0.00006931539,0.8475671,0.001111919,0.0005115183,0.000009353844,0.01543119,0.000009031795,0.1156058,0.00006934049,0.0008370039,0.01849525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001080059,0.000320111,0.2236441,0.0001931635,0.0001394525,0.00006973567,0.00004622184,0.0001603972,0.7184149,0.000006465065,0.05545107,0.0004743747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916772,0.007067769,0.000004212178,0.00004046995,0.0002251814,0.0001153323,0.00003184195,0.0000990983,0.0007389598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991544,0.0002342578,0.00005720827,0.00001171331,0.0004167841,0.00002493456,0.00001440842,0.00003068079,0.00005558097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.623923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4752743,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01002482780252562,"score_gpt":0.1869090998718953,"score_spread":0.1768842720693697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}