{"id":"W1499753532","doi":"10.15376/biores.7.3.3076-3092","title":"Characterizing Changbai larch through veneering. Part 2: Effect of diameter at breast height and radial growth","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BioResources","topic":"Wood Treatment and Properties","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"FPInnovations","funders":"Chinese Academy of Forestry; FPInnovations; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Pith; Veneer; Larch; Diameter at breast height; Bark (sound); Horticulture; Laminated veneer lumber; Population; Mathematics; Botany; Materials science; Composite material; Forestry; Biology; Medicine; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003024309,0.0003722727,0.0002684619,0.0008058939,0.000301637,0.0003138677,0.0001679183,0.0002042964,0.0006173851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002034885,0.0001282069,0.0002692704,0.0003874172,0.0001641304,0.0002661168,0.0001577667,0.0002613991,0.0001755895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000449609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001700873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005554656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02268663,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998749,0.00001999703,0.000008580596,0.00004661304,0.00002770902,0.00002216043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997057,0.00009348062,0.00006988674,0.00001531394,0.00005464076,0.00006107675],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001618803,0.00006056164,0.06287969,0.00004695675,0.0000206096,0.00009429757,0.00008520083,0.0002709565,0.9312188,0.00002096418,0.00001638802,0.005123738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005413379,0.0009480191,0.8504094,0.000005866951,0.00006090226,0.0002250518,0.0002755626,0.0008681812,0.1466076,0.00002679026,0.0005507834,0.00001637956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986531,0.0002473784,0.000611861,0.000004420594,0.000001324769,0.00001664156,0.0001684288,0.000009756824,0.0002871399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963886,0.0002218443,0.001864235,0.0000279539,0.000002272715,0.00002663285,0.0006917213,0.00001282138,0.0007639378],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005554656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01104462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01002482780252562,"score_gpt":0.1869090998718953,"score_spread":0.1768842720693697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}