{"id":"W1500445260","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2012.00377.x","title":"The Antinomies of ‘Financial Inclusion’: Debt, Distress and the Workings of <scp>I</scp>ndian Microfinance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Microfinance and Financial Inclusion","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Microfinance; Financial inclusion; Financialization; Narrative; Unbanked; Inclusion (mineral); Agrarian society; Politics; Technocracy; Economics; Political economy; Financial services; Political science; Sociology; Market economy; Finance; Economic growth; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002321438,0.0001943335,0.0007290092,0.0001878731,0.0005682192,0.00004005788,0.0005828501,0.0001589458,0.000008708541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007291056,0.0001275711,0.0002737092,0.0003776261,0.0005241489,0.0004237451,0.000601955,0.0003137572,0.000008149462],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004392919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003841486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002636096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005265305,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980682,0.00005171701,0.001206842,0.0001542458,0.0001078468,0.0004111567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965429,0.0004472083,0.002501222,0.0002947691,0.0001289068,0.00008500392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004735398,0.0004567896,0.3190949,0.0002559802,0.0001390637,0.0000153953,0.05052087,0.000001608805,0.001883401,0.5677503,0.01475328,0.04465495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002929009,0.0002486985,0.5349224,0.0003857847,0.00005653103,0.00008132294,0.0007496498,0.00001857268,0.00533003,0.03351706,0.4215578,0.0002031184],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9016345,0.09241749,0.0002455661,0.00160775,0.001303736,0.0002698638,0.0001256395,0.000003540408,0.002391975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842842,0.01417788,0.000241843,0.0002448379,0.0007877274,0.000007819853,0.000002634895,0.00001536782,0.0002376765],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5342332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5202196,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02770682211325128,"score_gpt":0.2161566646658924,"score_spread":0.1884498425526411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}