{"id":"W1500445260","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2012.00377.x","title":"The Antinomies of ‘Financial Inclusion’: Debt, Distress and the Workings of <scp>I</scp>ndian Microfinance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Microfinance and Financial Inclusion","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Microfinance; Financial inclusion; Financialization; Narrative; Unbanked; Inclusion (mineral); Agrarian society; Politics; Technocracy; Economics; Political economy; Financial services; Political science; Sociology; Market economy; Finance; Economic growth; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00238344,0.0001685119,0.0002048887,0.001224343,0.003669617,0.006245738,0.0005600319,0.001219425,0.002839819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004956181,0.0001196465,0.0001262845,0.001426378,0.02609082,0.006472459,0.004902188,0.002203473,0.0001178009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003775381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001863981,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005419035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005766881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986804,0.0007563386,0.00004229267,0.00009104211,0.00025105,0.0001788911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974089,0.001481889,0.0005323393,0.0001682825,0.0002032503,0.0002053898],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004686863,0.00002603018,0.003864242,0.00004220899,0.000003751084,0.000195943,0.04424771,0.0001809536,0.0002245022,0.9345331,0.00145527,0.01517936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002067226,0.00005939696,0.02510629,0.0004092547,0.00001405604,0.0005759166,0.09126627,0.00180741,0.0009518258,0.7132668,0.1664653,0.00005675432],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6875993,0.004267827,0.008943856,0.07739251,0.0001303342,0.00001975336,0.00007486274,0.00002957925,0.2215419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996982,0.0004408344,0.0003324462,0.0003203583,0.0000319827,0.000005446631,0.000005497396,0.000004789119,0.00187661],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006245738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02739251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02770682211325128,"score_gpt":0.2161566646658924,"score_spread":0.1884498425526411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}