{"id":"W1500507241","doi":"10.18926/46980","title":"Motivation towards learning a second language (A Case Study-Part2. Denmark)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Danish; Second language; Section (typography); Psychology; Language acquisition; Linguistics; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Advertising; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002818865,0.0004175207,0.0005467148,0.00136696,0.005198479,0.002890148,0.0009557287,0.002707081,0.001887843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003511602,0.0004588398,0.0006557216,0.001533362,0.001524334,0.001261514,0.001878619,0.001281825,0.0004363781],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00440391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002088579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03534279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06986894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967358,0.001354597,0.0002340282,0.0003913569,0.0004873415,0.0007968248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972367,0.001396145,0.0003764479,0.0001280404,0.0002069831,0.0006556495],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007155102,0.004394655,0.2677647,0.0009698655,0.00008033892,0.05038181,0.6090719,0.001391075,0.005128659,0.009287165,0.004292001,0.0465223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001227159,0.001217753,0.2899383,0.0004648716,0.00009054159,0.02465358,0.6140589,0.000990795,0.006889563,0.000906228,0.0604924,0.0001743937],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943948,0.0002503271,0.000226175,0.0002400509,0.00001233116,0.00009579529,0.0001041894,0.000003848713,0.004672514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930828,0.0004347417,0.0009744134,0.0001184685,0.000005618174,0.0001086555,0.0001271161,0.000005482798,0.005142796],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03534279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07027411,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03051921044596937,"score_gpt":0.3212217954212803,"score_spread":0.2907025849753109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}