{"id":"W1501057957","doi":"10.1002/bsl.2159","title":"Evaluation and Applications of the Clinically Significant Change Method with the Violence Risk Scale‐Sexual Offender Version: Implications for Risk‐Change Communication","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Demography; Risk assessment; Psychology; Sexual violence; Poison control; Sex offense; Scale (ratio); Injury prevention; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Sexual abuse; Computer security; Medical emergency; Computer science; Criminology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05723634,0.0007121785,0.0008216986,0.003509678,0.0008354923,0.001309943,0.001295186,0.0007286546,0.001466458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1481037,0.0004568793,0.001392314,0.002567289,0.00119742,0.001377259,0.002010551,0.001802025,0.000354295],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000891095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001252896,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002574909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00578029,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9424741,0.04659471,0.002971013,0.00121728,0.006261658,0.0004811237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8458564,0.1097345,0.01807909,0.01010461,0.0147444,0.00148083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001187079,0.0006908842,0.8669801,0.0001012113,0.0004281868,0.00007452127,0.003678371,0.001082732,0.0005912698,0.000670606,0.001072817,0.1234422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002704042,0.005671279,0.9613594,0.00007078958,0.000205961,0.0002883576,0.003082871,0.02444732,0.001317266,0.001198113,0.00199115,0.00009712399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9701766,0.0002576105,0.02171125,0.0005467189,0.0001547046,0.002150925,0.000330083,0.0001348669,0.004537124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720838,0.00008274187,0.0244454,0.00007994402,0.00007264278,0.002295945,0.0002396404,0.00003307007,0.0006668369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9427637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3026983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2706951371671945,"score_gpt":0.4631776923763257,"score_spread":0.1924825552091312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}