{"id":"W1501113772","doi":"10.1007/s11572-006-9007-9","title":"A. P. Simester (ed): Appraising Strict Liability","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Law and Philosophy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Liability; Strict liability; Sophistication; Normative; Criminal liability; Law and economics; Due diligence; Law; Criminal law; Recklessness; Political science; Relation (database); Culpability; Philosophy of law; Business; Sociology; Comparative law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002006898,0.001172316,0.0008424821,0.005389578,0.0008184325,0.004029484,0.001148961,0.00310343,0.03148607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006009232,0.0006252212,0.000417271,0.0058219,0.002129479,0.005986589,0.001477678,0.002721995,0.008662446],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001560182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00200387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005982782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01049206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999121,0.0002744138,0.00006035157,0.00007100235,0.0004318015,0.0000414112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965498,0.002120326,0.0002923722,0.0001001567,0.0007275601,0.0002097758],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006449886,0.00004691283,0.001628675,0.001134627,0.00003554266,0.0002077693,0.0006805698,0.001953868,0.0002107857,0.1089348,0.4492865,0.4358155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002483221,0.00009099925,0.01091429,0.004924574,0.0000707706,0.001754197,0.001295191,0.002420816,0.0005837189,0.3212863,0.6565718,0.00006258458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001824265,0.8577943,0.01213954,0.03202223,0.00467577,0.00004021313,0.000327892,0.00008875422,0.0910871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04121241,0.9129795,0.009279587,0.002391725,0.005236258,0.00004981119,0.0001987707,0.00005499995,0.02859686],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03148607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1053314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03654291292939747,"score_gpt":0.224651468550642,"score_spread":0.1881085556212445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}