{"id":"W1501315626","doi":"10.22230/jem.2010v11n3a50","title":"Considerations for Rehabilitating Naturally Disturbed Stands: Part 2. Stand Level Treatments and Hydrological Equivalent Clearcut Area","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecosystems and Management","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Native Health Society; University of British Columbia","funders":"Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Mountain pine beetle; Forest management; Salvage logging; Environmental science; Geography; Silviculture; Scale (ratio); Cumulative effects; Forestry; Natural forest; Agroforestry; Forest ecology; Ecology; Ecosystem; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001034604,0.0001648539,0.0003233014,0.00005588562,0.0001886971,0.00007102916,0.00008464315,0.00005295631,0.0001339578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001000028,0.0001161981,0.00007812706,0.00004936481,0.00006562052,0.0002594299,0.0001162124,0.0000855381,0.000003860843],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001611703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006243445,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007889117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002796362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985843,0.0001073956,0.000569751,0.0002448722,0.0002548213,0.0002388011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990596,0.0002542569,0.0003659294,0.000141519,0.00002887336,0.0001497939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004156918,0.005208904,0.6169123,0.008130198,0.00702152,0.002282308,0.03108903,0.0007176012,0.009091536,0.0295589,0.1841162,0.1017146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02452757,0.02151758,0.7346904,0.003275089,0.001847848,0.001880871,0.008183325,0.03186289,0.0008807766,0.02243681,0.1464993,0.002397595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939384,0.0005117913,0.001247607,0.0002296155,0.0003787295,0.001078577,0.00004913999,0.00001315172,0.002552954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932261,0.0001866086,0.006127933,0.00005410579,0.00004587543,0.00004669312,0.000001327382,0.00001231443,0.0002990112],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1177781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4738422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0638617473864211,"score_gpt":0.2499408673757665,"score_spread":0.1860791199893455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}